A good carpet cleaning tool should be easy to use, reliable and well-maintained, according to new research.
Research published in the journal Cleaning Technology & Technologies, conducted by the UK’s Institute of Technology, found that cleaning machines with multiple sensors can make a carpet cleaner even more effective than those with single sensors.
This is because they provide a ‘smart’ signal to the cleaners to help them detect the presence of dirt and dust.
However, researchers also found that the amount of cleaning power achieved by the machines depends on the sensors and whether the cleaner has multiple sensors or just one.
They found that two sensors can significantly improve the amount that a carpet can be cleaned without the carpet getting clogged.
The researchers analysed the data from 23 cleaning machines, using different types of sensors, to see which ones were the most effective at cleaning carpet.
They also analysed the carpet cleaning results and found that, in general, cleaning machines that have multiple sensors perform better than single sensors and can even outperform single sensors in some cases.
The report says that although the best carpet cleaners have been designed to clean only the surface of a carpet, they can also clean a carpet from both sides, helping to keep carpet cleaner than a vacuum cleaner.
Researchers at the Institute of Education, Technology and Research (IETR) say that they have found that there is a need for cleaning machines to be ‘smart’.
They say that the need for smart cleaning machines is driven by increasing concerns over clogged carpets.
Researchers believe that carpet cleaning machines are becoming a cheaper and more accessible option for cleaning carpets, with some experts saying that carpet cleaners are becoming more affordable to buy.
The study also found some common complaints from carpet cleaners to be false, while others were due to the carpet cleaner not being designed to work with multiple sensing sensors.
“Carpet cleaning machines do not have the capability to automatically identify the presence and/or size of any contaminants on the carpet surface,” the study says.
“In addition, the cleaning machines can not detect the number of sensor sensors and therefore do not provide any indication to the user of the carpet’s quality.
This makes it more difficult for the user to tell which carpet cleaner to use.”
The study is the latest in a string of studies that have found carpet cleaners can outperform the effectiveness of vacuum cleaners in cleaning carpet and that cleaning devices can detect a carpet’s level of dirt before it has actually been cleaned.
The research found that carpets with multiple sensor cleaning devices outperformed vacuum cleaners, but the cleaner still had to be used frequently to make the difference.
The cleaners in the study were designed to be installed in carpet cleaning facilities to allow them to ‘know’ the presence or size of contaminants, and they have a built-in sensor that monitors how long carpet cleaners take to clean the carpet.
Carpets that are cleaned using one cleaning device will still be cleaner than carpet that has multiple cleaning devices installed, according the study.
However the study found that carpet cleaner with multiple cleaning sensors performed significantly better than carpet cleaner without multiple sensors.
However it also found a problem with vacuum cleaners that are not designed to do more than clean a surface, and it is the ability of carpet cleaners with multiple detecting sensors to detect the size of carpet and whether it is clogged or not.
Researchers say that carpet machines are often ‘built-in’ to carpet cleaning and that it is not necessary to remove the carpet to clean it.
However carpet cleaners that have a sensor on the surface may also be able to detect whether there is carpet in the carpet or not, making it possible for them to detect clogging, the researchers say.
“We believe that it would be very easy to design carpet cleaning tools that use multiple sensing and can detect the location of the contaminants, which could then allow the cleaning to be more efficient,” said IETR’s Dr Andrew Hill.
“The ability to detect carpets size and the presence/size of the carpets surface could provide the user with information on whether it’s a problem or not.”
The findings are published in Cleaning Trends and could help reduce the time needed to clean carpets and prevent clogging of carpets that have been cleaned by carpet cleaners.
The findings will be published in an upcoming issue of Cleaning Technologies & Technologies.
Read more about carpet cleaners